City of Madison
Legislative File ID   12473
Type:   Ordinance    Status:   Filed
Enactment Date:      Enactment No.:  
Title:  
Creating Section 28.06(2)(a)3394 of the Madison General Ordinances rezoning property from R6 General Residence District to PUD(GDP) Planned Unit Development (General Development Plan) District and creating Section 28.06(2)(a)3395 of the Madison General Ordinances rezoning property from PUD(GDP) Planned Unit Development (General Development Plan) District to PUD(SIP) Planned Unit Development (Specific Implementation Plan) District. Proposed Use: Remodel Existing Apartment Building and Construct New 16-Unit Apartment Building; 2nd Aldermanic District: 201-229 West Lakelawn Place.
Controlling Body:   PLAN COMMISSION
Introduced:   10/28/2008    Version:   1
Final Action:   2/3/2009    Contact:   sarnott@cityofmadison.com
Name:  
Rezone West Lakelawn Place
Extra Date 1:  
Requester:   PLAN COMMISSION
Sponsors:  
Common Council By Request
Legislative History
DateActing BodyAction TakenMotion
10/28/2008Attorney's Office/Approval GroupThis Ordinance was Referred for Introduction
Notes: Plan Commission; Public Hearings: Plan Commission, 12/15/08; Common Council, 01/06/09
11/18/2008COMMON COUNCILThis Ordinance was Referred for Public Hearing to the PLAN COMMISSION, due back on 1/6/2009
Notes: Additional Referral(s): Landmarks Commission Due back at the 1/6/09 Common Council Meeting.
11/18/2008PLAN COMMISSIONThis Ordinance was Refer to the LANDMARKS COMMISSION due back on 1/6/2009
Notes: Due back at the 1/6/09 Common Council Meeting.
12/15/2008PLAN COMMISSIONA motion was made by Kerr, seconded by Boll, to RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO REREFER - PUBLIC HEARING to the PLAN COMMISSION. The motion passed by voice vote/other.Pass
Notes: This matter was referred pending a recommendation by the Urban Design Commission.
1/6/2009COMMON COUNCILA motion was made by Ald. Bruer, seconded by Ald. Clear, to Rerefer for Recessed Public Hearing to the PLAN COMMISSION. The motion passed by voice vote/other.Pass
Notes:
1/12/2009PLAN COMMISSIONA motion was made by Kerr, seconded by Boll, to RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO REREFER - RECESSED PUBLIC HEARING. The motion passed by the following vote:Pass
(6:1)
Notes: This item was referred for the applicant to obtain final approval from the Urban Design Commission. The Plan Commission requests that if the Urban Design Commission grants final approval, that the UDC makes a formal finding that the criteria for approval of PUDs in this Downtown Design zones are met. The Plan Commission also requested an opinion from the City Attorney's office on whether the Downtown Design Criteria should be applied as required standards or guidelines. The motion carried by a vote of 6:1 with Ald. Gruber casting the dissenting vote.
1/20/2009COMMON COUNCILA motion was made by Ald. Bruer, seconded by Ald. Clear, to Rerefer for Recessed Public Hearing to the PLAN COMMISSION. The motion passed by voice vote/other.Pass
Notes:
1/26/2009PLAN COMMISSIONA motion was made by Gruber, seconded by Basford, to RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS - RECESSED PUBLIC HEARING. The motion FAILED by the following vote:Fail
(4:4)
Notes: A motion to recommend approval of the project made by Ald. Gruber, seconded by Basford failed on the following tied vote 4:4 (AYE: Ald. Gruber, Basford, Sunquist, and Whitaker; NO: Ald. Cnare, Ald. Kerr, Olson, and Bowser; NON VOTING: Fey and Heifetz). Fey chose not to break the tie. A substitute motion to refer the project to the February 9, 2009 Plan Commission meeting, moved by Basford and seconded by Olson, was withdrawn at the request of the applicant.
2/3/2009COMMON COUNCILA motion was made by Ald. Verveer, seconded by Ald. Kerr, to Place On File Without Prejudice and Close the Public Hearing. The motion passed by voice vote/other.Pass
Notes:
2/3/2009COMMON COUNCILA motion was made by Ald. Clear, seconded by Ald. Schumacher, to Adopt and Close the Public Hearing subject to the comments and conditions contained in Option A of the 1/9/09 Planning Report and the 1/23 Addendum to the Planning Report. The motion FAILED by the following vote:Fail
(10:9)
Notes: 8 Registrant(s) in support wishing to speak; 8 Registrant(s) in opposition wishing to speak; 1 Registrant(s) neither in support nor opposition wishing to speak; 6 Registrant(s) in support not wishing to speak; 6 Registrant(s) in opposition not wishing to speak.
Approvals
ApproverDateApproval Status
Eric Knepp10/30/2008Approved
Michael May10/30/2008Approved

  powered by Daystar Computer Systems, Inc.